FORT FAIRFIELD JOURNAL

                                  Real.  Educational.  News.

 Fort Fairfield Journal     About Us     Contact Us    Advertising Rates      Subscribe       Distribution       Bible Reference     Our Library

Debt Money: Part 6

By: David Deschesne

Fort Fairfield Journal, March 12, 2008

There’s big business in debt money and banks who foist artificially created money onto a citizenry need accomplices with the perceived authority of government to help enforce the discharging of debt with still more debt from an unwitting public. They have found a willing accomplice - a “collection agency,” if you will - in the District Court system. This article will reference the Maine District Court System, but all other states have similar arrangements.

The Maine District Court is controlled by judges who are all members of the Maine Bar Association.¹

The Maine Bar Association is a private club, first formed on March 18, 1891,² seventy years after Maine formed its own government and became a state.

One of the most telling signs that the Maine Bar is not a government agency is its website is appended with a “.org” instead of “.gov” as all government websites are. Members of the Bar Association are assessed dues based upon a dues schedule - a situation that wouldn’t exist if the Maine Bar were a government organization.

As a private, dues-assessing club, similar to any other service club, the Maine Bar Association has its own President, Vice President, Treasurer and 11 district governors³, none of whom are elected by the general public, although their club exercises extreme amounts of power over the public - power regulated by its own rules, not the legislature.

Bank loans are created from artificially created money at the time of the loan and represent no money previously existing on hand at the bank.⁴ Since this information is not disclosed at the time of the loan, borrowers believe they are borrowing actual pre-existing money, thus making bank loan contracts instituted by fraud and deception.

When a bank sues a borrower for payment (discharge) of a loan, they will generally hire an attorney, who is a lawyer in their State’s Bar Association. In Maine, if the defendant, the borrower, brings to light in a court case, that the loan was instituted via fraud on the part of the bank, the lawyer must reveal that fact to the tribunal in which it is being tried.⁵ However, most lawyers and judges in Maine work in collusion with the banks because the business of enforcing fraudulent bank loans is so lucrative.

In the event a person finds there is judicial misconduct, they may file a complaint with the Committee on Judicial Responsibility and Disability.⁶ However, the Committee is stacked with a 4 to 3 majority of Bar Association member lawyers and judges,⁷ so it is unlikely that a private citizen would ever be able to force the breakup of said collusion by holding judges and lawyers accountable.

A recent credit card lawsuit held in a Maine District Court is an example of how judges flagrantly disregard law and procedure as they attempt to run defense for the banks.

In this case, a person, who has opted to remain anonymous, defended herself in a credit card lawsuit in a Maine District Court against a major bank being represented by a Portland, Maine-based attorney. It is enough to note that this author has reviewed all the court documents and is providing a synopsis of the case and ruling as follows:

The defendant requested Verification of the Debt and a copy of the original contract with her signature. The credit card company refused to verify the authenticity of the debt and forwarded a copy of the original contractual agreement that was photocopied so darkly it was illegible. The credit card company merely forwarded a couple of monthly statements as evidence of a debt. However, monthly statements are merely presumption of a debt, not actual proof. They provided no signed credit card slips or other hard copy documents that a loan was ever lawfully entered into with full disclosure to the defendant.

The defendant also brought up in her defense, numerous economic textbook references citing money in the United States is created artificially from nothing at the time of the loan and since the credit card company was unable to produce evidence of a pre-existing account with pre-existing money to fund the credit card loan, they suffered no damages and a ruling in their favor would be nothing short of unjust enrichment.

The Maine District Court judge, who presumably was seeking to prop up the unconstitutional money system of Federal Reserve Notes issued a ruling on behalf of the bank and said essentially the defendant was just trying to get out of paying a debt, and that none of the information on the money system, from the economics textbooks was based on fact. He also said that the arguments were “frivolous” - a favorite term for judges to use when they don’t want to address politically-charged topics.

This person has continued to not pay the fraudulent credit card “loan” judgment and has suffered by having a lien placed on her home for the bogus amount of the fraudulent judgment.

This type of collusion between the banks and the courts happens on a daily basis across the United States as judges attempt to prop up a failing, unconstitutional monetary system for the benefit of the bankers who run it. This is understandable in Maine, since the people in Maine (supposedly) passed a Constitutional amendment in 1967 to repeal the offices of judges and registers of probate as Constitutional officers⁸ seemingly allowing them to operate on whatever rules they want outside of the bounds of the Constitution.

1. 4 MRSA §157

2. Modern Maine, ©1951 Lewis Historical Publishing Co., Inc., Vol. II p. 49

3. www.mainebar.org/lead_governors.asp

4. Principles of Bank Operations, ©1975 American Institute of Banking, American Bankers Association, p. 207

5. Maine Bar Rules, Rule 3.6 (b)

6. Rules of the Committee on Judicial Responsibility, Rule 1(A), cited from Maine Rules of Court, ©2001 West Publishing, p. 403.

7. op cit. p. 401

8. www.state.me.us/legis/lawlib/const.htm